瑞星卡卡安全论坛综合娱乐区Rising茶馆 【推荐】印度崛起的背后

1   1  /  1  页   跳转

【推荐】印度崛起的背后

【推荐】印度崛起的背后

ENGAGING INDIA: CHANGE IN THE COUNTRYSIDE

 
Amy Yee
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
 
 
Far from the dynamic bustle of India's cities, change is also afoot in rural India. Two villages in the southern state of Andhra Pradesh illustrate how rural India is making small but significant steps to break poverty's grip.

Some broad measures have ignited remarkable progress in the two villages including access to banking services; better agricultural techniques and water management; empowerment of women; and new agribusinesses such as the growing of trees used for biofuel.

The village of Kishtapur, home to about 800 people, is nearly six hours' drive from the southern city of Hyderabad. Located in a historically poor district of the state, it is hardly the typical picture of 'rising India'.

Packed dirt paths weave through clusters of small houses with tin roofs and outdoor latrines. Cows, goats and chickens wander calmly through yards near thatch sheds. In fields at the foot of the village, barefoot men, women and children dig drainage ditches by prying soil from the earth with a pole and moving the black clods with their hands.

By developed country standards, Kishtapur looks poor. Yet while the village is by no means rich, the standard of living of its inhabitants has risen steadily.

Average family incomes have increased more than 50 per cent, from Rs32,959 ($716) in 2002-03 to Rs50,172 ($1,090) in March 2007.

Life in Kishtapur is a world away from India's cities, home to billion-dollar companies and robust consumerism. But what unfolds in Kishtapur and thousands of other Indian villages is just as much the fabric of India's future.

Manmohan Singh, prime minister, has repeatedly warned that the uneven development of urban and rural economies could harm political and social stability.

He has urged greater investment in agriculture to remedy a brewing farming crisis that stands in sharp contrast to the country's booming industrial growth.

”There is a very strong correlation between agrarian prosperity and demand for manufactured goods and modern services across the country,” said Mr Singh at an agriculture summit in New Delhi last year.

”The route to sustaining high economy-wide growth rates has to be accelerated through agricultural development.”

India's annual economic growth exceeds 8 per cent but agricultural growth rates have stagnated from 4.7 per cent in the years between 1992-97 to just 1.5 per cent from 2002 to 2006.

Just a few years ago, Kishtapur was an example of stagnation and disarray. The village was plagued by unemployment, alcoholism and infighting. Tired of drunken fights sparked by their men, village women formed self-help groups under the guidance of government poverty alleviation programmes.

Under this model, groups of about a dozen women collectively make monthly deposits into a local co-operative bank. When they have established a record of regular deposits, they are eligible for bank loans with annual interest rates far lower than the 60 per cent charged by local loan sharks. Together they decide how to spend loans, whether investing in seeds, farm tools, cows or a tin roof and rely on one another to repay loans lest the group's record be marred.

In the past three years, loans have grown from a few thousand rupees per group to Rs30,000 last year. Just last month, the bank approved a large loan of Rs3m for all seven self-help groups that villagers say will be used to repay all old debts to loan sharks. Keeping in mind that 80 per cent of India's population of 1.1bn lacks access to financial services, Kishtapur's banking activities represent a quiet revolution.

As an elected village leader, 30-year-old Chandra Kala makes regular visits to the bank a few kilometres away although she is illiterate. This is a dramatic change for a woman so shy she used to hide when government workers visited the village.

Over the past few years other big changes have happened. With government aid, the villagers built a paved road leading toward the village, as well as a bridge over a gully that floods during monsoon season. They have cultivated new sources of income such as worm compost that is sold as rich fertilizer to other farmers for Rs3.50 per kilogram.

Most of Kishtapur's residents are illiterate. But now 100 of the 120 children in the village attend local schools where just a few years ago school was considered an activity for ”rich people”.

The women's self-help groups have worked so well that the chastened men have formed three ”gents” self-help groups.

Kishtapur is not the poorest of India's villages. It has had sporadic electricity since the 1980s and water pumps are scattered throughout the village. But telltale signs of greater prosperity have emerged. The village counts 80 televisions (no wonder India's media industry is booming), three satellite dishes, a few three-wheeled auto rickshaws and even a ”two-wheeler” or motorcycle.

Happily, Kishtapur is a village that has risen above the poverty line.

There are no satellite dishes yet in the village of Powerguda, about two hours drive from Kishtapur. But this village of about 300 tribal people of the Gond minority has also undergone dramatic change. Powerguda's crop yields from the dry soil were so low that most of the villagers had taken to migrant work on other farms. Alcoholism too plagued the village.

But under two programmes launched in 2000, agricultural scientists introduced new water conservation techniques. The International Fund for Agricultural Development and the Inter-Tribal Development Authority provided funding. The International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) gave technical guidance.

With this support, villagers dug long trenches to channel rain into shallow reservoirs that replenish groundwater supply. They built small dams made of stones to stem rain run-off and to prevent precious topsoil from being washed away.

These seemingly simple watershed measures helped boost crop yields dramatically. Cotton yields increased 45 per cent from 1999 to 2002, for instance.

Focus was given to crops such as soybeans, which were more productive than sorghum and cotton. As a result of better water supply, vegetables were grown for the first time in Powerguda.

Powerguda has also availed of self-help groups and bank loans. New businesses are also sprouting. Notably, villagers are growing pongamia tree seedlings that the government is buying to plant in forests and other villages.

Seed money for the pongamia nursery came from the World Bank in 2003, which gave about $650 to Powerguda to offset carbon emissions for participants flying to a conference in Washington.

Pongamia, an unassuming medium-sized tree, is gaining prominence because its large brown seeds produce oil that can be used to run generators and farm equipment.

Better earnings from crops and income from building watershed structures have helped boost average family income before government assistance to nearly Rs27,821 in 2002-03 from Rs15,677 in 1999-2000.

That doesn't include potential future income from Powerguda's 10,000 pongamia trees that are still three to four years from maturity.

As a result, thatch huts have been replaced by homes with solid walls, water pumps have been installed and villagers have practically halted seasonal work in other locales.

Both Kishtapur and Powerguda have shown remarkable progress within just a few years. But these villages are just a drop in the bucket. Tens of thousands of villages in India lack government support and access to banks.

Andhra Pradesh, like many southern states, also benefits from a more progressive outlook in contrast to conservative northern states. Half of India's 1m self-help groups are in Andhra Pradesh.

These two villages are admittedly stand-outs, but their lessons should not be ignored.

”People are dressed better than they used to be. Health and education has improved,” says Emmanuel D'Silva, a visiting scientist with ICRISAT. ”But there's still a long way to go. There's still a huge gap between urban and rural India.”
最后编辑2007-05-08 15:50:12
分享到:
gototop
 

印度崛起的背后

 
作者:英国《金融时报》艾米•叶(Amy Yee)
2007年5月8日 星期二
 
 
印度的城市正在急速发展,而远离城市的农村地区也在发生着变化。印度南部安德拉邦(Andhra Pradesh)两个村庄的变迁,就展示了印度农村如何迈开意义重大的小步伐,以摆脱贫困的束缚。

在这两个村子,一些重要的措施已经带来令人瞩目的进步。这些措施包括:引进银行服务,加强农业技术和水资源管理,让妇女拥有更多权利,鼓励新型农业(比如种植可用作生物燃料的林木)等。

开希特普村(Kishtapur)是其中之一。这里大约有800个村民,距离印度南部城市海德拉巴(Hyderabad)有近6小时车程。村子所在区域历来是安德拉邦的贫穷地带,根本无法代表“崛起的印度”。肮脏的小路两侧杂乱地分布着一户户铁皮屋顶的小房子,厕所在户外,牛、羊、鸡等在茅草舍棚周围的院落里怡然自得地随处游走。村子尽头的田地里,赤脚的男人、女人和小孩正在挖排水沟——他们用棍子将土从地下挖起来,然后用手将这些黑土运走。

按照发达国家的标准,开希特普村显得很贫穷。不过,虽然该村绝对称不上富裕,但这里的生活水平已经有了巨大的提升。

村里的家庭平均收入已经提高超过50%,从2002年-2003年间的3.2959万卢比(合716美元),增加到2007年3月的5.0172万卢比(合1090美元)。

与大型公司总部所在的、消费主义盛行的印度城市相比,开希特普村的生活是一个不同的世界。但开希特普及其它成千上万个印度村庄所展现的景象,同样也代表着印度的未来。

印度总理曼汉姆•辛格(Manmohan Singh)曾多次警告说,城乡经济发展不平衡可能危及印度的政治与社会稳定。

他敦促加大对农业的投资,以缓解正在酝酿中的农业危机——该国的农业与蓬勃发展的工业形成了鲜明对比。

辛格去年在新德里出席一次农业峰会时表示:“农村繁荣和全国的制造业产品与服务需求之间有着很强的相关性。”

“为了加快印度经济实现可持续的全面高速增长,我们必须促进农业发展。”

印度的年经济增长率超过8%,但农业增长率已大幅回落,从1992至1997年间的4.7%跌至2002至2006年的1.5%。

就在几年前,开希特普村还是一个经济停滞和社会混乱的典型。失业、酗酒和打架斗殴现象困扰着整个村庄。村里的妇女们厌倦了男人们醉酒引发的打斗,她们在政府减贫计划的引导下,成立了自助小组。

在这种模式下,大约12位妇女组成的一个小组,每个小组每个月集体向一个本地合作银行存钱。当她们定期存款一段时间后,她们就可以获得银行发放的低息贷款。这些贷款的年利率要比当地高利贷低60%。小组成员共同决定如何支配贷款,比如是否用来购买种子、农业生产工具、母牛或铁皮屋顶,然后依靠相互帮助来偿还贷款,以免小组的贷款信誉受损。

过去三年间,每个小组的平均贷款数额已经从数千卢比增加到去年的3万卢比。就在上个月,银行刚刚批准向全部7个自助小组发放了一笔高达3百万卢比的贷款。村民们说,她们将用这笔钱偿还剩余的全部高利贷债务。要知道,印度11亿人口中,有80%的人得不到银行服务,因此,开希特普村的贷款实践意味着一场静悄悄的革命。

作为民选村长,30岁的钱德拉•卡拉(Chandra Kala)虽然是个文盲,但她仍会定期拜访几公里之外的合作银行。卡拉曾经非常羞涩,过去,政府工作人员来村子的时候,她常常躲起来。对她来说,如今的表现是一个巨大的变化。

过去几年还出现了其它一些大变化。在政府帮助下,村民们铺建了通向村庄的道路,在一个雨季会发洪水的小河上架设了一座桥。他们还开辟了新的收入渠道,比如说将蚯蚓堆肥作为高效肥料,以每公斤3.5卢比的价格出售给其它农户。

开希特普村大多数村民都是文盲,但该村120名儿童中,有100个入读了当地的学校。就在数年前,学校在当地还被认为是“有钱人家”孩子去的地方。看到妇女自助小组运作如此良好,变乖了的男人们也成立了三个“男人”自助小组。

开希特普并不是印度最穷的村庄。自80年代以来,已经有一些人家通了电,也有几户人家买了水泵。但现在,更繁荣的迹象已经出现。村里有80台电视机(由此看来,印度媒体行业的繁荣一点也不让人奇怪),有三个卫星电视天线,几辆三轮机动黄包车,甚至还有一辆摩托车。

令人高兴的是,开希特普村已经脱离了贫困线。

在距离该村两小时车程的普尔古达村(Powerguda),那里还没有卫星电视接收天线。但这个由300名龚德人(Gond)组成的少数民族部落也经历了巨大的变化。普尔古达的干旱土壤使得农作物收成很差,因此,大多数村民都在别的农场干活。酗酒也是该村面临的严重问题。

但根据2000年推行的两项计划,农业科学家为该村带来了新的节水种植技术。联合国国际农业发展基金(IFAD)和印度“部落发展局”(Inter-Tribal Development Authority)为这些计划提供了资金,印度的国际半干旱热带作物研究所(ICRISAT)提供技术指导。

在他们的帮助下,村民们挖出长长的水沟,将雨水引导至浅浅的蓄水池里,用来补充地下水供应。他们用石头建起堤坝,以免雨水流失,并防止珍贵的表层土壤被雨水冲走。

这些看似简单的蓄水措施大大提高了农作物收成。比如,当地的棉花产量在1999年到2002年间就提高了45%。

计划的重点放在了大豆等农作物上面。与高粱和棉花相比,大豆的产量更大。有了较好的水源供应之后,普尔古达村在历史上首次种出了蔬菜。

普尔古达村也从自助小组和银行贷款模式中受益。新的致富门路也在不断出现。其中值得一提的是,村民们开始种植水黄皮(pongamia)树苗,印度政府将会购买这些树苗,然后将它们种到森林和其它村庄去。

水黄皮苗圃的种子资金是世界银行(World Bank)在2003年提供的。当时,世行向普尔古达村提供了大约650美元资金,用于抵消到华盛顿参加世行会议的与会者乘飞机所造成的碳排放。

不算高大的水黄皮树貌不惊人,但它正日益受到关注,因为它硕大的褐色种子能够榨油,用来驱动发电机和农用设备。

农作物收成提高,以及建造蓄水设施的劳务报酬,改善了村民们的收入。不算政府援助,普尔古达村户均收入已经从1999-2000年间的1.5677万卢比,提高到2002-2003年间的2.7821万卢比。

这还不包括该村1万颗水黄皮树将要带来的收入。这些树还要生长三四年时间才能出售。

于是,砖瓦房取代了茅草屋,村里安装了抽水机,村民们实际上已经停止了在其它地方的季节性打工。

开希特普村和普尔古达村在短短几年内都取得了巨大进步。但这两个村庄只是沧海一粟。在印度,还有上万个村庄得不到政府支持,享受不到银行服务。

与保守的北方邦相比,安德拉邦和很多南方邦更加富有改革性,这让它们获益匪浅。印度100万个自助小组中,有一半在安德拉邦。

无可否认,开希特普村和普尔古达村取得了突出成绩,但他们的教训也不应该被忽视。

“人们穿得比以前好了,健康和教育状况也改善了,”国际半干旱热带作物研究所的访问科学家以马利•德希尔瓦(Emmanuel D'Silva)说,“但他们仍有很长的路要走。印度城乡之间仍有巨大的鸿沟。”
gototop
 
1   1  /  1  页   跳转
页面顶部
Powered by Discuz!NT