瑞星卡卡安全论坛综合娱乐区Rising茶馆 【推荐】中国股市重演日本股市悲剧?

1   1  /  1  页   跳转

【推荐】中国股市重演日本股市悲剧?

【推荐】中国股市重演日本股市悲剧?

CHINA'S NOISY RISE EVOKES ECHOES OF JAPAN CRASH

 
Tony Jackson
Thursday, September 20, 2007
 
 
It is natural to be impressed with the way Chinese markets are shrugging off the turmoil in the West. But there is a faint, disquieting echo. Is it just me, or is this all too reminiscent of Japan 20 years ago?

Nonsense, the bulls will say. Granted, Japan sailed serenely through the Wall Street crash of 1987, only to drop off its own much steeper precipice two years later. But China is no Japan. It is vast and surging. It is the future.

This is to forget how awesome the Japan story was in the late 1980s. In world markets, the Japanese were regarded as unstoppable. “They're relentless,” said Jack Welch, of General Electric. “Make them climb a mountain, and they'll look around for a bigger one.”

Congress bayed for protection against the Japanese juggernaut. A posse of Detroit executives went to Tokyo to plead for relief from Japan's export drive. The Wall Street Journal proposed sardonically that Japan could keep the executives provided it kept sending the cars.

Meanwhile, Japan's corporate buyers prowled the world for trophies. On the US west coast, they bought chunks of the film industry. In the east, they snapped up New York's Rockefeller Center. In London, Nomura acquired and lavishly occupied the old General Post Office – “a bubble building”, one of its executives said to me sadly soon after. This newspaper sold its City headquarters to a Japanese developer and withdrew prudently to humbler quarters across the river. Today, it is taken for granted that China is unstoppable. If its industries are not yet sweeping the world, they will be shortly. And they are marching up the value chain, from toys and shoes to software and pharmaceuticals.

Chinese buyers are abroad in force, snapping up anything from IBM's personal computer business to chunks of Barclays and Blackstone. Across the western world, markets are a-twitter at the forthcoming deluge of cash from China's sovereign wealth funds.

The comparison can be pressed further. Back then, of course, investors reacted to the Japanese miracle by pushing the equity market to fantastic levels. At the end of 1989, just before the crash, the dollar value of the Japanese market was almost twice that of the US. Guess what? Today the Chinese market, if we include Hong Kong, is bigger than Japan's.

Back then, bulls of Japan argued that the Tokyo market was not as expensive as it looked, because the big companies all had large cross-holdings in each other. While the logic was a little elusive, the effect in China today is the reverse. By one estimate, half the Shanghai market's earnings growth in this year's first half came from rising share prices.

Back then, bulls would tell you the Tokyo market could only go up because Japanese savers had nowhere else to put their cash. Today we are told that because Chinese investors can only get 3.5 per cent on bank deposits, while inflation is running at 6.5 per cent, they have no alternative but to buy stocks. This fallacy is seductive, since it implies the market can logically have no ceiling. It is generally deployed as a last resort, when the fundamentals have fallen by the wayside. And whenever I meet it, the phrase “Japanese wall of money” springs to mind. In all this, I do not mean to draw direct comparisons between the two economies. They are plainly very different – indeed, the Chinese economy resembles nothing the world has ever seen. The parallels are rather in human behaviour, which in times like these sets market prices as much as the fundamentals.

It remains to be asked what the results of a Chinese market slump would be. After all, the Japanese crash was materially damaging, since real estate values also collapsed and the banks were left with a mountain of bad debts.

The snag is that we have no good data on Chinese real estate prices, nor would most people believe them if we had. As for the banks, it would be surprising if an essentially state-controlled system had mastered the techniques of commercial lending, but you never know.

It all comes back to the feel of the thing. As Charles Dumas of Lombard Street Research remarks, China is in a solipsistic bubble. And there, at least, the Japanese parallel is exact.

[用户系统信息]Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; (R1 1.3))
最后编辑2007-09-20 22:57:56.013000000
分享到:
gototop
 

中国股市重演日本股市悲剧?

 
作者:英国《金融时报》托尼•杰克逊(Tony Jackson)
2007年9月20日 星期四
 
 
中国市场没有受到西方金融市场动荡的影响,这一点自然令人印象深刻。不过,这里却响起了一个微弱但令人不安的回声。是否只有我,或者还是所有人都回忆起了20年前的日本?

乐观的人会说我胡说。我们都知道,日本从容躲过了1987年的华尔街崩盘,却在两年后从更陡峭的悬崖上跌了下去。但是,中国不是日本,中国规模庞大且增长迅速,它代表着未来。

这样想是忘了上世纪80年代末日本那场可怕的遭遇。在全球市场,日本人曾被视为不可阻挡的力量。“他们无情,”通用电气(General Electric)的杰克•韦尔奇(Jack Welch)表示。“他们登上一座高山后,会四处寻觅更高的山峰。”

美国国会曾奋力疾呼,希望保护美国经济不受日本的摧残。底特律汽车界的一些高管们前往东京,恳求日本减弱其向美国的出口势头。《华尔街日报》(Wall Street Journal)曾讽刺地建议,如果日本继续向美国出口汽车,则大可将那些美国高管留在日本。

同时,日本企业收购者在世界范围内四处寻觅收购目标。 在美国西海岸,他们收购了电影产业的大片河山。在东海岸,他们收购了纽约洛克菲勒中心(Rockefeller Center)。在伦敦,野村证券(Nomura)收购并大举占领了老的邮政总局大楼(General Post Office),而该公司的一位高管曾在不久以后遗憾的告诉我,说这是一座“泡沫建筑”。英国《金融时报》曾将位于金融城的总部大楼,出售给了一位日本开发商,审慎地搬到河对岸相对谦逊一些的总部大楼。如今,人们想当然地认为,中国也是一支不可阻挡的力量。如果中国行业迄今尚未横扫全球,那么他们将很快做到这点。他们正走向价值链的高端,从玩具、鞋子到软件和药品。

中国收购者正在大规模地走出国门。他们的收购目标从IBM的个人电脑业务到巴克莱(Barclays)和百仕通 (Blackstone,前译黑石)的部分股权。在整个西方世界,面对即将到来的中国主权财富基金的资金潮,市场都感到兴奋。

两国的对比还可以再深入一些。当年,投资者对日本奇迹的反应是将股市推升至神奇高位。1989年底,就在日本股市崩盘之前,日本市值折合成美元几乎是美国市值的两倍。你猜怎么着?如今,中国市场(包括香港)的规模比日本还大。

当年,看好日本的人士曾辩称,东京股市并不像看上去那么昂贵,因为大公司都存在大量的交叉持股。尽管这一逻辑有些晦涩,但中国目前的状况恰恰相反。有人估计,今年上半年,上海股市半数收益增幅来自于不断上涨的股价。

当年,乐观人士会告诉你,日本股市只能上涨,因为日本投资者没有其它投资途径。如今,我们得知,中国投资者的银行储蓄回报率只有3.5%,而通胀率则高达6.5%。他们毫无选择,只能购买股票。这种谬论相当诱人,因为它暗示,从逻辑上而言,中国股市没有上限。当基本面因素无法解释的时候,这一谬论通常会被用作最后的救命稻草。而每次我看到这一谬论时,“日本巨额资金”这个词就会跳入我的脑海。总之,我并不是要对中日经济体进行直接的比较。它们从本质上截然不同。实际上,中国经济不同于我们曾看到的任何一个经济体。对两国的比较,更多在于比较人的行为。如同基本面因素一样,在类似当前的时期,人的行为将确定市场价格。

人们仍会问,中国股市下跌会出现什么结果。毕竟,日本股市崩盘曾带来巨大的破坏性,因为房地产价格也出现暴跌,同时,也令银行背上了巨额坏账的包袱。

问题在于,我们缺乏关于中国房地产价格的可靠数据,就算我们拥有这些数据,多数人也不会相信它。至于中国的银行,如果一个基本由政府控制的体系掌握了商业贷款的技巧,这会令人吃惊,但那也难说。

这完全取决于你的感觉。就像朗伯德街研究(Lombard Street Research)的查尔斯•杜马斯(Charles Dumas)所言:中国处于一个自成一体的泡沫中。至少,这一点与日本是相同的。
gototop
 
1   1  /  1  页   跳转
页面顶部
Powered by Discuz!NT