瑞星卡卡安全论坛综合娱乐区Rising茶馆 【推荐】谁能解黑色星期二之谜?

1   1  /  1  页   跳转

【推荐】谁能解黑色星期二之谜?

【推荐】谁能解黑色星期二之谜?

CHINA ROARS BUT IT'S STILL TOO YOUNG TO BE CALLING ALL THE SHOTS

 
By Geoff Dyer in Shanghai and Joanna Chung in Hong Kong
Thursday, March 01, 2007
 
 
Shanghai's new status as a weathervane for global markets proved to be short-lived after the stock market in mainland China rallied strongly yesterday in spite of sharp falls in the rest of Asia and Europe.

The dramatic trading on Tuesday, when the mainland market plunged 9 per cent, had raised the prospect that China was developing the capacity to spread global financial contagion. Halfway round the world, traders on Wall Street were blaming the Shanghai market for Tuesday's 3.5 per cent drop in the S&P 500.

Indeed, there was some subdued pride among Chinese traders that the biggest one-day drop in a decade in Shanghai had also demonstrated the apparent importance of the country in global markets.

“This probably can be viewed as a drill for China's stock market to get more pricing power in international markets,” said Zhang Yidong, analyst at Industrial Securities in Shanghai.

Brian Baker, head of Pimco Asia, added: “What happens in one part of the world, even in a relatively closed economy like China, can affect asset prices around the globe.”

Yet, in China yesterday, there was also a lot of head-scratching – not just about what actually really happened in the mainland market on “black Tuesday”, as it is now being called but also about why the rest of the world seemed to care so much. With no economic news coming out, analysts struggled to find a convincing explanation.

Some analysts suggested that, with the National People's Congress beginning in Beijing next week, investors feared new policies or comments designed to talk the market down.

At the weekend, the government had announced renewed measures against illegal stock-trading and rumours circulated about the introduction of a capital gains tax for equities, even though few analysts think such a policy likely. Investors were also discussing the possibility of a new interest rate rise to counteract the inflationary impact of higher food prices.

Steven Sun, of HSBC, added that $4.4bn of shares that used to be non-tradeable will potentially come onto the market in March under a government reform plan.

Yet most of these concerns had been doing the rounds for several weeks. The most likely explanation, analysts said, was a bout of profit-taking.

The mainland market was up 130 per cent in 2006 and broke the 3,000 point mark for the first time on Monday, which was a signal for many institutions to temporarily retreat.

Harder to explain was why a sharp fall in the Shanghai market should have such a big impact around the world.

The Chinese economy is vulnerable to weakness in the US, especially given the importance of the export sector, yet analysts say that the Shanghai market does not respond quickly to changes in US consumer sentiment. The big listed companies are largely inward-facing: 30 per cent of the Shanghai Composite index is taken up by China Life, Bank of China and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China alone.

The stock market has proved to be a poor barometer for the economy. From 2001-2005, when GDP grew at around 9 per cent a year, share prices fell by half.

On top of that, mainland stocks are relatively insulated from the cross-border capital flows that influence other markets. Chinese residents have few options if they want to take their savings offshore and foreign investors are restricted to buying around $10 billion of mainland shares.

Indeed, one reason why foreign investors have become so interested in the Chinese market over the last year is the perception that it provides a form of hedge because it is largely driven by domestic sentiment rather than Fed announcements or worries about the “carry trade” that affect so many other markets.

There are many ways China can rattle global markets. A sharp economic slowdown would likely end the commodities boom and if China were to stop using its reserves to purchase US Treasuries, bond markets would suffer. But of all the things investors need to keep their eye on at the moment, the Shanghai stock market is probably not one of them.

附件附件:

您所在的用户组无法下载或查看附件

最后编辑2007-03-04 08:39:13.450000000
分享到:
gototop
 

谁能解黑色星期二之谜?

 
英国《金融时报》杰夫•代尔(Geoff Dyer)上海、乔安娜•钟(Joanna Chung)香港报道
2007年3月1日 星期四
 
 
上海股市昨日强劲反弹,而亚洲其它市场和欧洲股市则大幅下挫。这一切表明,对于上海来说,“全球市场风向标”这一全新身份是短暂的。

上海股市周二曾暴跌9%。这极富戏剧性的一幕一度让人们觉得,中国正日益具备传染全球金融市场的能力。在地球的另一边,标准普尔500(S&P 500)指数周二下挫3.5%,华尔街交易员将其归因于上海市场的下跌。

实际上,中国的交易员们私下里颇有些自豪。他们认为,尽管上海市场出现了10年来最大单日跌幅,但这也证明了中国在全球市场中显而易见的重要地位。

兴业证券(Industrial Securities)驻上海的分析师张忆东表示:“或许,可以将此次下跌视为中国股市在国际市场获取更多定价权的一次演练。”

Pimco Asia主管布赖恩•贝克(Brian Baker)补充道:“世界某地发生的事件——即使发生在中国这样一个相对封闭的经济体中,都可能影响全球的资产价格。”

但在中国国内,人们昨日也感到大惑不解。他们不明白,在“黑色星期二”那一天,中国股市到底发生了什么;他们也不明白,为何全球其它股市看上去如此在意。由于没有任何经济层面的消息,分析师们难以找到一个令人信服的解释。

一些分析师认为,随着全国人民代表大会(National People's Congress)下周将在北京召开,投资者担心将出现“唱衰”股市的新政策和新言论。

上周末,中国政府宣布了打击非法股票交易的新措施,市场也盛传政府将对股票开征资本利得税——尽管很少分析师认为这一政策将会出台。此外,投资者也在讨论政府是否有可能再次加息,以抵消粮价上涨造成的通胀影响。

汇丰(HSBC)驻香港分析师Steven Sun补充道,按照中国政府的股改计划,3月份可能将有价值44亿美元原先不可流通的股票进入市场。

但这些担忧中,多数已经在市场上持续了数周。分析师表示,新一轮获利回吐是上海股市暴跌最有可能的解释。

上海股市去年上涨130%,并在本周一首次收于3000点大关之上。对许多机构而言,这是一个暂时离场的信号。

更加难以解释的是,为何上海股市的暴跌会对全球股市产生如此巨大的影响。

中国经济容易受到美国经济走软的冲击,主要原因是出口部门在中国经济中占据着重要地位。但分析师表示,上海股市对美国消费者人气的变化并不敏感。在上海上市的大型企业基本上都是内向型的:仅中国人寿(China Life)、中国银行(BoC)和中国工商银行(ICBC)三家上市公司,便占据了上证综合指数(Shanghai Composite index) 30%的权重。

事实证明,中国股市未能很好地扮演中国经济晴雨表的角色。2001年至2005年,中国国内生产总值(GDP)以每年9%左右的速度增长,而股市在这段时间却下跌了50%。

此外,其它股市经常容易受到跨境资本流的影响,但中国内地股市却处于相对隔绝的状态。中国居民储蓄投资海外的渠道非常有限,外国投资者购买内地股票的额度也仅限于100亿美元左右。

实际上,外国投资者在过去一年中之所以对中国股市如此感兴趣,原因之一是他们认为,中国股市可以为他们的投资提供了某种形式的对冲,因为中国股市在很大程度上是受国内投资者人气的推动,而非美联储(Fed)的公告或市场对“套利交易”(carry trade)的担忧——这些因素经常对其它许多市场产生影响。

中国影响全球市场的方式有很多。如果中国经济急速放缓,全球大宗商品市场的繁荣景象就有可能终结;如果中国停止使用其外汇储备购买美国国债,全球债券市场将遭受冲击。但在投资者目前需要关注的所有问题中,上海股市可能不在其列。

附件附件:

您所在的用户组无法下载或查看附件

gototop
 
1   1  /  1  页   跳转
页面顶部
Powered by Discuz!NT